Ultima speranță

2 comentarii la “Ultima speranță”

Citeşte sau adaugă un comentariu...

1. 1dr pepper

   26 octombrie 2010 la ora 4:29

   so, how about this?

   Texas is the biggest prize because the state is expected to gain four U.S. House seats from the census. Democrats need a net gain of only three seats to take control of the 150-member Texas House. But James Henson, who directs the Texas Politics Project and teaches at the University of Texas at Austin, considers that a long shot.

   scrisesem mai demult pe PBBR despre cum se populeaza texasul din cauza economiei.
   Insa patru locuri in senat potrivit census?
   Wow! That’s something, if ya know what I mean.
   GOP poised to win Congress redistricting edge, too ca sa nu mai spun ca in cursele guvernamentale de stat castiga grupa mare.
   Cred ca urmatorul deceniu va apartine republicanilor, insa vestea buna este ca va apartine republicanilor gen allen west ( care apropos face foarte bine in Florida)/
   Am comentat astazi pentru o saptaman intreaga
2. 2dr pepper

   26 octombrie 2010 la ora 5:15

   P.s. Emil ma bucur ca ai descris miscarea ca fiind populara – populist suna mai bine in engleza.
   Si ca o adaugire la stiati ca ( n’am idee pe unde e ca debea ma obisnuiesc cu site-ul) Thomas Jefferson si John Adams au murit in aceeasi zi – 4 iulie 1826, la 50 de ani de la adoptarea declaratiei de independenta.
   Sustine Gordon S Wood autorul cartii Revolutionary Characters ceea ce a facut ca declaratia de independenta ” sa prinda o aura divina”.
   Ce m’a determinat sa incep aceasta carte? Nu multitudinea de premii castigate de Wood ci mai degraba faptul ca l’a avut profesor pe Bailyn care

   Bailyn argued that republicanism was at the core of the values Americans fought for. He located the intellectual sources of the American Revolution within a broader British political framework, explaining how English country Whig ideas about civic virtue, corruption, ancient rights, and fear of autocracy were, in the colonies, transformed into the ideology of republicanism.

   si a fost totodata ridicat in slavi de Gingrich spre totala dizgratie a elitei progresiste.
   La inceputul cartii ( unde ma si aflu defapt) explica aversiunea mediilor academice fata de parintii fondatori si incercarea acestora de a debunk mitul despre parintii fondatori ( nu de putine ori am citit idei tampe de stanga pe forumuri despre cat de depasita este constitutia americana).
   “No other major nation homors its past historical characters. especially characters who existed two centuries ago, in quite the manner we Americans do.” explica Woods la inceputul cartii .
   ” We want to know what Thomas Jefferson would think about affirmative action, or George Wahington of the invasion of Iraq”.
   Iar daca urmaresti stirile americane ai sa realizezi ca totul se raporteaza la constituie – cea luata ad litteram de catre dreapta sau distorsionata de catre stanga ( vezi cazul dezbaterii coons-o’donnell din alegerile pentru senat din statul delaware).
   “The British don’t have to check in periodically with, say, either of the two Williams Pitts the way we seem to check in w/ Jefferson or Washington.”
   Foarte interesant.