Patrula musulmană din Not-So-Great Britain


    “Not-So-Great Britain!”

    Londra 2013. “Patrula musulmană” străbate străzile din White Chapel, Londra, pentru a se asigura ca nici un trecător, fie că e musulman sau nemusulman, nu incalcă legea islamică.

    “Aceasta e o zona musulmană, alcoolul nu este permis”, i se spune unui trecător cu o bere în mînă. “Aceasta este o patrulă musulmană care supraveghează zona interzicînd răul. Alcoolul e rău, fără alcool, da? O zi bună!”, îi spun membrii patrulei strivindu-i cutia de bere cu piciorul. Un alt trecător ripostează și spune ca nu crede în legea islamică – “Nu ne interesează ce crezi!”, i se răspunde pe un ton răstit. O femei acostată de patrulă spune, “sînt îngrozită, aici e Marea Britanie”, iar cel care filmeaza îi răspunde, “We don’t care. It’s Not-So-Great Britain, Not-So-Great Britain. We impose islamic law upon your necks!”

    “Not-So-Great Europe!”

    Guvernul francez a publicat o listă a celor 750 de zone interzise din Franța, numite “Zones urbaines sensibiles”, sau ZUS. Un articol scris de Soeren Ken și tradus de Bogdan Calehari puteți citi aici:

    “Recent au fost delimitate 751 de “Zones urbaines sensibles“, sau ZUS, cum mai sunt numite printr-un eufemism. O listă completă a acestor ZUS se gaseşte pe un site oficial al guvernului francez, cu hărţi din satelit şi o demarcare precisă a străzilor. Se estimează că cinci milioane de musulmani trăiesc în aceste “zone urbane sensibile”, zone în care statul francez nu-şi mai exercită controlul”, scrie Soeren Kern.

    Zonele interzise, unde de multe ori legea locului este legea islamică, nu sînt un fenoment limitat la teritoriul Franței și al Angliei, ci constituie un fenomen răspîndit în majoritatea marilor orașe din Europa Occidentală.

    Exemple din:

    Puteți sprijini activitatea noastră cu o donație unică sau una recurentă prin Patreon.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email


    1. Pe vremuri, strazile din White Chapel erau strabatute noaptea de Jack Spintecatorul – asta a fost varianta hard. In zilele noastre se practica varianta soft, ele find bantuite de, i-am putea spune, “politie religioasa londoneza”! Ea, politia religioasa, este la inceput in Anglia; actioneaza inca cu timiditate, din cauza asta am spus ca este varianta soft a Spintecatorului. Dar, in vitorul apropiat, prima fiind Londra, marile orase engleze vor intra in lumea buna, alaturi de Teheran, Jeddah, Mogadishu sau Kabul.
      Datorita asezari geografice, vitrege i-as spune, britanicii n-au putut avea Politie Politica; din cauza asta l-au avut pe Orwell. Acum, pentru ca este democratie si nimeni nu-i mai poate opri (a murit si Churchill, a murit si Enoch Powell) se vor da peste cap sa aiba, macar, Politie Religioasa.

    2. Politia germana in slujba Hamas – 2009, Duisburg – Germania

      In orasul meu Duisburg (Germania) 10000 de oameni au demonstrat astazi impotriva Israelului si pentru a-si exprima solidaritatea cu Hamas-ul.
      De aceea, eu si prietena mea am decis sa punem doua steaguri israeliene la ferestrele apartamentului nostru de la etajul 3.
      In timpul demonstratiei care a avut loc si pe strada noastra, politia a fortat usa, a intrat in apartamentul nostru si a scos steagul Israelului.
      Declaratia politiei a fost ca au actionat ca sa dezamorseze situatia, deoarece multi demonstranti tineri erau pe cale sa ne sparga usa apartamentului.
      Inainte de aceasta ei [tinerii] au aruncat cu bulgari de zapada, cutite si pietrea asupra apartamentului si a intregii cladiri.
      Eram amandoi pe partea cealalta a strazii si am fost socati sa vedem un ofiter de politie in dormitorul nostru in timp ce deschide fereastra si insfaca steagul.
      Fotografia ilustreaza situatia.
      Politia se supune cerintelor gloatei.

    3. Vizionarea filmuletelor a provocat in Anglia o reactie de dezaprobare din partea opiniei publice, care n-a putut fi trecuta cu vederea de catre autoritati. Asa ca politia engleza s-a vazut obligata sa actioneze, ea raportand ca 4 membri ai “politiei religioase”, ce actiona in estul Londrei, au fost arestati.
      Mare minune!

    4. The Commentator The deafening silence of the Left over the ‘Muslim Patrol’

      There aren’t many times in politics when people of different stripes can unite over an issue, but I’m heartened to see that the Left have joined the chorus of condemnation over the disgusting behaviour of the thuggish ‘Muslim Patrol’ gang.

      Sorry, hold on. That’s in a parallel universe. Here in our universe, no such thing has happened. As with every other instance of Islamist fanaticism, the Left remains silent. Case in point: I emailed several groups, including Unite Against Fascism (UAF), The Respect Party (RP), and The Socialist Workers Party (SWP), asking for their comments on the incidents. Want to guess how many replied to me?


      Bear in mind my emails were polite, concise and formal; I don’t go in for name calling and playground-level discourse. Of course, that’s what they would prefer. Had I written a long, ranty email full of insults, they would have responded like a shot. Take that ammunition away from them by asking a simple, sober question, and they can’t respond. As an aside, I also emailed George Galloway asking for his reaction; equally polite. Not that I expected a reply from him either.

      This is what is so fascinating about those on the Left who proclaim to fight against fascism, racism, misogyny and homophobia. If they were honest, they would admit they’re highly selective about whom they actually fight. In their bizarrely distorted world view, fascism and homophobia perpetrated by some people is wrong, but fascism and homophobia perpetrated by Islamists is fine (well, what else can one conclude from their blanket silence?).

      This pick-and-choose approach, based on a type of ‘right-on’ politics, is morally bankrupt.

      Now, I can imagine some on the Left might stress that the actions of a few extremist individuals are not worthy of serious comment. That would be a legitimate point except that comment (read: shriek) is precisely what they do on every other issue or topic where Islamists aren’t the perpetrators.

      Can you imagine the reaction if a gang of hooded men had gone up to a Muslim woman and told her to take off her face veil because she was in a British city? Or forced a Muslim man to drink a can of beer because it’s part of our culture? The likes of the UAF would have rightly been in every TV and radio studio – the BBC would have welcomed them with open arms – calling for arrests and protests.

      But they won’t say a word about Muslim men verbally abusing a young woman for “not obeying allah” by wearing a skirt, or calling a man a “fag” and warning him to get out of the area. To UAF members, I must ask: isn’t that fascism – telling a woman what she should or shouldn’t wear in a country where women have the right to dress how they please, or subjecting someone to homophobic slurs in a country where people have the right to love whoever they want?

      Silence constitutes approval, and when these thugs see little or no reaction, they become more brazen and their numbers will grow.

      The ‘Muslim Patrol’ issue is more than one of backward idiots; this forms part of the wider issue of identity and how the UK, as a sovereign nation, has gradually had its identity, the right of the population to self-identify as British, eroded. Eroded, not by Muslims or any other minority, but by elements of the Left who have acted as enablers.

      For years the Left has shut down any attempt at reasoned debate by introducing the intellectually false concept of Islamaphobia. Taking this absurd claim on its own terms, I’m reminded of what Douglas Murray once said so incisively on the BBC’s Question Time: “there’s nothing irrational about having a fear of those who constantly talk about wanting to kill you.”

      The ‘Muslim Patrol’ symbolises how far we’ve declined, to the extent that there are now certain areas where a British citizen cannot feel safe simply doing the things we all have the right to do. And yet they’re ignored by the very same Left who vehemently stand up for the right of Islamic countries to exist however they wish.

      You remember the old adage that a liberal is a conservative who hasn’t been mugged yet? I have a reconfiguration of that for Britain in 2013: An apologist for Islamism is a secular realist who hasn’t been subjected to verbal abuse by a gang of hooded men late at night or had a friend or loved one blown up by suicide bombers yet. Doesn’t roll off the tongue as smoothly, I grant you, but it bears thinking about.

      The Polly Toynbees, Mark Steels and George Galloways of this world haven’t experienced what the victims in the ‘Muslim Patrol’ videos experienced. They don’t live in Whitechapel or Tower Hamlets; they reside in nice, comfortable suburbs, holding middle class dinner parties where they tut-tut with grave concern about how a cap on housing benefit is tantamount to the Holocaust, as Polly infamously claimed.

      Whilst I don’t wish ill on anyone, until someone at the heart of the leftist commentariat is personally subjected to the tactics of the ‘Muslim Patrol’, their silence may well continue.

    5. Cand patrulele islamice vor intra in guvernele Frantei, Angliei si Germaniei pentru respectarea legii islamice? De-abia astept!. O EUROPA ISLAMICA.! Halal noua. …. PS. Si cu ajutorul lui Alah, poate asistam si la o AMERICA ISLAMICA. De-abia asteapta asta , Barac Obama.


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here